Rationality for Engineers: Part III: Content and Context of Heuristics

Document Type : Original Article


Brunel University, London


The focus of heuristics is on the content of decisions; however, the contexts are equally important; that is, where and how heuristics are used will often have a great influence on the outcome. Engineers need a lot of specialized skills, hard as well as soft, to successfully apply heuristics, i.e., to identify the heuristic that best fits the environment. Heuristics can help to lessen (not eliminate) the cognitive burden. This part of the four-part paper discusses how heuristics are created, improved, and refuted, and describes what judgment errors they might cause. In using heuristics, engineers must be aware of biases, which is examined in this part. The context of decision-making is also considered, and finally, the paper shows how heuristics should be used.

In engineering, heuristics are experience-based methods used to reduce the need for calculations such as equipment size, performance, or operating conditions. Heuristics are fallible and do not guarantee an optimal solution. It is important to understand their limitations when applying them to a different context. Heuristics work well in a stable environment, but if the environment is complex and changing, heuristics may lose their relevance and require updating. Though the applicability of heuristics is conditional, they can be of value when used expertly


[1] Australian Defense Force Procedures (ADFP) 5.0.1—Joint Military Appreciation Process, edition 2 is issued for use by the Australian Defense Force and is effective forthwith. This publication supersedes ADFP 5.0.1 Edition 2 AL3. 15 August 2019.
[2] Bate, P., (2018 ). Perspectives on contextContext is everything, The health foundation perspective on-context.
[3] Meadows, D.H.(2008),-Thinking in Systems: International Bestseller Illustrated Edition, Kindle Edition Chelsea Green Publishing; Illustrated edition.
[4] Jackson, A.P.,(2017), The Evolution of the Australian Defense Force’s Joint Operational Art Author(s): Vol. 13, No. 1, Getting the Balance Right (2017), pp. 59-80 Published by: Institute for Regional Security.
[5] Kahneman, D., and Tversky. A. (1982). “Intuitive Prediction: Biases and corrective procedures,” in Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, ed. D. Kahnemann, P. Slovic and A. Tversky, pp. 414-421, Cambridge University Press.
[6] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 263-291.
[7] Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan.
[8] Klein, G. A., Calderwood, R., & Clinton-Cirocco, A. (1986). Rapid decision-making on the fire ground. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 30,576– 580.
[9] Klein, G., Calderwood, R., & Clinton-Cirocco, A. (2010). Rapid decision making on the fire ground: The original study plus a postscript. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 4, 186–209.
[10] Klein, G (1993) A Recognition-Primed Decision Model of Rapid Decision-Making in G.A Klein et al Decision-Making in Action: Models and Methods pp 138-147, Ablex Publishing: Norwood, NJ.
[11] Klein, G (1998) Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
[12] Lambert, B. (2018). A Student’s Guide to Bayesian Statistics SAGE Publications Ltd, 520 pages.
[13] Love, P. E., R. Lopez, D. J. Edwards, and Y. M. Goh. 2012. “Error begat error: Design error analysis and prevention in social infrastructure projects.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 48 (Sep): 100–110.
[14] Popper, K., (2002). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge Classics, 2nd edition.
[15] Rechtin, E., (1991), Systems Architecting: Creating & Building Complex Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[16] Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency, 1990.
[17] Slovic P, Kunreuther H, White G: (2000). Decision Processes, Rationality, and Adjustment to Natural Hazards. In: The Perception of Risk Edited by Slovic, P. Sterling: Earthscan Publications Ltd; 2000:1-31.
[18] Smith, A. F. M. (2015). "George Edward Pelham Box. 10 October 1919 – 28 March 2013". Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society. 61: 23-37.
[19] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
[20] Yasseri,S,(2013), The ALARP Argument.
[21] Yasseri, S., (2015), Evidence-based practice in subsea engineering Underwater Technology, The International Journal of the Society for Underwater 32(4).
[22] Yasseri, S., (2017), Thinking Like an Engineer.
[23] Yasseri, S. and Bahai, H, (2018) Safety in Marine Operations IJCOE Vol.2/No. 3/Autumn 2018 (29-40).
[24] Yasseri, S., (2021), Rationality for engineers, Part II, IJCOE Vol.4/No. 2/Summer 2020 (1-13).
[25] Yasseri, S., (2021), Rationality for engineers, Part II, IJCOE Vol.4/No. 2/Summer 2020 (1-13)
[26] Yasseri, S., (2021), Rationality for engineers, Part I.