A Parametric Study of Critical Buckling Force in Snaked Lay Pipelines under HP/HT Condition


1 Mechanical Engineering, Petroleum University of Technology

2 Mechanical Engineering Department, Petroleum University of Technology

3 Iranian Offshore Oil Company(IOOC)


Pipelines are an economical way for offshore oil and gas transportation. In operation conditions, flowing high pressure/high temperature (HP/HT) fluids may induce axial expansion. If this expansion is constrained, axial stresses will be created and they may cause pipeline buckling. In order to reduce damages and avoid buckling in unpredictable places, the controlled buckling concept is introduced. To use this concept in the present study, buckling is triggered at some predetermined locations by using the snaked laying method. This paper analyzes the global buckling process of a pipeline by using numerical simulation methods and the effects of loading (internal pressure and temperature) and section properties (diameter and thickness) are investigated on the critical buckling force of snaked lay pipelines under HP/HT conditions. Then, the analysis results of the finite element method (FEM) are compared with analytical solutions and previous simulation methods. This work includes performing nonlinear finite element analysis and modeling pipe-soil interaction of as-laid pipelines by the use of spring elements. The results show that the use of equivalent temperature instead of pressure difference, as already applied in previous studies, is not an authentic method and cannot introduce an accurate outcome. The analysis shows that by increasing pressure and decreasing temperature, the critical buckling force is decreased and the pipeline buckling occurs sooner. The investigation of section properties indicates that the most effective parameter is thickness. It is remarkable to know that at low values of thickness, the effect of diameter is negligible and by increasing thickness, the influence of diameter is increased. Comparing the analytical and numerical results reveals that at low values of circumferential stiffness (ratio of diameter to thickness), there are minor differences between numerical and analytical results.


  1. Z. Hong, R. Liu, W. Liu, and S. Yan, (2015), A lateral global buckling failure envelope for a high temperature and high pressure (HT/HP) submarine pipeline, Applied Ocean Research, Vol. 51, p. 117-128. [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2015.02.008]
  2. Z. Wang, Z. Chen, Y. He, and H. Liu, (2015), Optimized configuration of snaked-lay subsea pipelines for controlled lateral buckling method, in The Twenty-fifth International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference.
  3. D. Bruton, M. Carr, M. Crawford, and E. Poiate, (2005), The safe design of hot on-bottom pipelines with lateral buckling using the design guideline developed by the safebuck joint industry project, in Proceedings of the Deep Offshore Technology Conference, Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil.
  4. J. O. Rundsag, K. Tørnes, G. Cumming, A. D. Rathbone, and C. Roberts, (2008), Optimised Snaked Lay Geometry., in Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
  5. Z.-G. Li, C. Wang, N. He, and D.-Y. Zhao, (2008), An overview of deepwater pipeline laying technology, China Ocean Engineering, Vol. 22, no. 3,p. 521-532.
  6. W. Liu and J. Fu, (2018), Global Buckling Behavior of Snaked-Laid and Straight Laid Subsea Pipelines, in the 28th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference.
  7. J. Guan, P. R. Nystro╠Şm, and H. F. Hansen, (2007), Optimized solutions to control lateral buckling of pipelines with snaked-lay: theoretical and numerical studies, in ASME 2007 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. [DOI:10.1115/OMAE2007-29256]
  8. I. Matheson, M. Carr, R. Peek, P. Saunders, and N. George, (2008), Penguins flowline lateral buckle formation analysis and verification, in ASME 2004 23rd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. [DOI:10.1115/OMAE2004-51202]
  9. M. Wagstaff, (2003), Detailed design and operational performance assessment of pipeline buckle initiators to mitigate lateral buckling, in Proceedings of the Petromin Pipeline Conference, Singapore.
  10. R. Preston, F. Drennan, and C. Cameron, (1999), Controlled lateral buckling of large diameter pipeline by snaked lay, in The Ninth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference.
  11. A. Rathbone, K. Tørnes, G. Cumming, C. Roberts, and J. Rundsag, (2008), Effect of lateral pipelay imperfections on global buckling design, in The Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference.
  12. G. Cumming and A. Rathbone, (2010), Euler buckling of idealised horizontal pipeline imperfections, in ASME 2010 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. [DOI:10.1115/OMAE2010-20262]
  13. I. Obele, (2013), Lateral buckling and axial walking of surface laid subsea pipeline, Master's thesis, University of Stavanger, Norway.
  14. Y. Liu, X. Li, and J. Zhou, (2013), Post-buckling studies on snaked-lay pipeline with new shape, Journal of information & computational science, Vol. 9(12), p. 3315-24.
  15. R. E. Hobbs, (1984), In-service buckling of heated pipelines, Journal of Transportation Engineering., Vol. 110(2), p.175-89. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1984)110:2(175)]
  16. N. Taylor and A. Gan, (1986 ), Refined modelling for the lateral buckling of submarine pipelines, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 6(2), p.143-62. [DOI:10.1016/0143-974X(86)90003-9]
  17. H. Karampour, F. Albermani, and J. Gross, (2013), On lateral and upheaval buckling of subsea pipelines, Engineering structures, Vol. 52, p.317-330. [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.037]
  18. Z. Hong, R. Liu, W. Liu, and S. Yan, (2015), Study on lateral buckling characteristics of a submarine pipeline with a single arch symmetric initial imperfection, Ocean engineering, Vol. 108, p.21-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.07.049]
  19. Y. Zhang, D. Yi, Z. Xiao, and Z. Huang, (2015), Engineering critical assessment for offshore pipelines with 3-D elliptical embedded cracks, Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 51(1), p.37-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.02.018]
  20. Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen, (2013), ABAQUS/STANDARD. User's Guide and Theoretical Manual, Version 6.13, 2013.
  21. O. Fyrileiv and L. Collberg, (2005), Influence of pressure in pipeline design: effective axial force, in ASME 2005 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. [DOI:10.1115/OMAE2005-67502]