Seismic Design of Subsea Jumper per ISO: Part I- Preliminaries


Brunel University London


Subsea rigid steel spools (spool) are used to connect subsea equipment using diver-less connectors. Spools must meet functional requirements such as pressure, temperature, thermal expansion, environmental load, installation loads, lack of fit (misalignments), etc., yielding numerous loading conditions.  The installation accuracy that the installation contractor can achieve is another issue.  Thus, it is inevitable that numerous geometries to be investigated and perform several iterations in search of a suitable configuration.  The no-burst concept, in conjunction with a High Integrity Pressure Protection (HIPP) system, leads to heavier spool wall thickness, hence less structural flexibility which in turn increases reactions on the subsea connectors, which in turn is transferred to the adjoining equipment. Add to this complexity, the seismic qualification requirement if a jumper is in an earthquake-prone area.  


  1. ASCE4-16, (2016), Seismic Analysis of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures. Published by ASCE to replace ASCE4-98 Seismic Analysis of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures and Commentary
  2. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings ATC-40, Volume 1 and 2 November.
  3. Berger, B. S. (1977), Vibrations of An Infinite Orthotropic Layered Cylindrical Viscoelastic Shell in An Acoustic Medium, Mechanical Engineering, 99, 105.
  4. Boulanger, R. W., Curras, C. J., Kutter, B. L., Wilson, D. W., & Abghari, A., (1999), Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125, 750-759. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:9(750)]
  5. El Naggar, M. H., and Bentley, K. J. (2000), Dynamic analysis for laterally loaded piles and dynamic p-y curves, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37, 1166-1183. [DOI:10.1139/t00-058]
  6. El Naggar, M. H. (1996), Nonlinear analysis for dynamic lateral pile response, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 15, 233-244. [DOI:10.1016/0267-7261(95)00049-6]
  7. El Naggar, M., Shayanfar, M.A., Kimiaei, M., Aghakouchak, A.A.,(2005), Simplified BNWF model for nonlinear seismic response analysis of offshore piles with nonlinear input ground motion analysis, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42, 2, pp. 365-380. [DOI:10.1139/t04-103]
  8. Eurocode 8: (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance.
  9. Gazetas, G., (2012), Nonlinear Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction, Proc.2nd International Conference on Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering.
  10. Gazetas, G. (1991), Formulas and Charts for Impedances of Surface and Embedded Foundations, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 117, 1363-1381. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:9(1363)]
  11. Gazetas, G. & Dobry, R. (1984a), Horizontal Response of Piles in Layered Soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering-ASCE, 110, 20-40. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:1(20)]
  12. Gazetas, G. & Dobry, R. (1984b), Simple Radiation Damping Model for Piles and Footings, Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 110, 937-956. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:6(937)]
  13. Hardin, B. O., and Drnevich, V. P., (1972), Shear Modulus and damping in soils, Proc.ASCE: Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 95(SM6), 1531-1537.
  14. Ghannad, A.M., and Jahankha, (2004), Strength Reduction Factors Considering Soil-Structure Interaction, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 2331
  15. Ghannad M.A., Fukuwa N. and Nishizaka R. (1998), A Study on Frequency and Damping of Soil-structure Systems Using Simplified Model, Journal of Structural Engineering (AIJ), 1998; 44B, 85-93.
  16. Lysmer, J. and Kuhlmeyer R.L. (1969), Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media, Journal of Engineering and Mechanical Division, 859-877.
  17. Jafarieh, A.H., and M. A. Ghannad M. A. (2014), The Effect of Foundation Uplift on Elastic Response of Soil-Structure Systems, International Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp 244-256.
  18. ISO 19902:2007, (2007), Petroleum and natural gas industries - Fixed steel offshore structures, Seismic Design Procedures, and Criteria.
  19. ISO 19901-2, (2004), Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries - Specific Requirements for Offshore Structures - Part 2: International Organization for Standardization: Seismic Design Procedures and Criteria.
  20. ISO 19901-4, (2002), Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries - Specific Requirements for Offshore Structures - Part 4: International Organization for Standardization: Geotechnical and Foundation Design Considerations.
  21. Idriss, I. M., and Sun, J. I. (1992), SHAKE91-A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits, User manual, Univ. of California at Davis, Davis, Calif.
  22. Ishibashi, I., and Zhang, X. J. (1993), Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay, Soils Found., 33(1), 182-191. [DOI:10.3208/sandf1972.33.182]
  23. Makris, N. & Gazetas, G. (1992), Dynamic Pile Soil Pile Interaction- Lateral and Seismic Response, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 21, 145-162. [DOI:10.1002/eqe.4290210204]
  24. Matlock, H., (1970), Correlations for the design of laterally loaded piles in soft clay, Preprints Second Annual Offshore Technology Conference, 1, 577-588. [DOI:10.4043/1204-MS]
  25. Nogami, T., Otani, J., Konagai, K., & Chen, H. L., (1992), Nonlinear Soil-Pile Interaction-Model for Dynamic Lateral Motion, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering-ASCE, 118, 89-106. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:1(89)]
  26. Novak, M., (1974), Dynamic stiffness and damping of piles, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 11, 574- 598 [DOI:10.1139/t74-059]
  27. Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1970), Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis, Rep. No. EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, Calif.
  28. Seed, H. B., Wong, R. T., Idriss, I. M., and Tokimatsu, K., (1986), Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analysis of cohesionless soils, J. Geotech. Eng., 112~111, 1016-1032. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:11(1016)]
  29. Spears, R.E. and S. R. Jensen (2009), Approach for Selection of Rayleigh Damping Parameters Used for Time History Analysis, 2009 ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Division Conference, PVP2009-77257, Prague [DOI:10.1115/PVP2009-77257]
  30. Stokoe, K. H., II, Darendeli, M. B., Andrus, R. D., and Brown, L. T. (1999), Dynamic soil properties: Laboratory, field, and correlation studies, Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 3, Lisbon, Portugal, 811-845.
  31. Darendeli, M. B., and Lee, N. J. (1995), Correlation study of nonlinear dynamic soils properties, Final Rep. to Westinghouse Savannah River Company,
  32. Vesic, M., (1961), Beam on the elastic subgrade and the Winkler hypothesis, Proc. International Conference Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Paris, 1, 845-850.
  33. Vucetic, M. and Dobry, R., (1991), Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering-ASCE, 117, 89-107. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)]
  34. Wolf J.P., (1994), Foundation vibration analysis using simple physical models, Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, N.J. The USA.
  35. Wolf, J. P. & Deeks, A. J. (2004), Foundation Vibration Analysis: A Strength-of-Materials Approach. Elsevier, Oxford, U.K.
  36. Yasseri, S, (2020), Seismic Design of Subsea Spools per ISO: Part II- Seismic requirements, IJCOE,Vol.4, No. 2, Summer 2020
  37. Yasseri, S., (2020), Seismic Design of Subsea Spools per ISO: Part III- Analysis & Design, IJCOE