Evaluatoin of Incompressible and Compressible SPH Methods in Modeling Dam Break Flows

Author

Tarbiat modares university

Abstract

Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic (SPH) is an attractive Lagrangian tool for simulating flows with large displacement at free surface boundary. Two widely used subcategories of this method are Weakly compressible SPH (WCSPH) and truly Incompressible SPH (ISPH) methods. Each method has its individual advantages while there is not yet a global agreement about the preference of one method to another one. In this study, accuracy, stability and efficiency of these methods are compared in simulating dam break flow as a well-known hydraulic problem. To decrease unrealistic particle fluctuation especially at free surface boundary, a practical solution is applied to both methods while keeping their total accuracy. In addition, different solid boundary treatments are studied and their effect on total accuracy and stability of SPH methods are investigated.
Based on the results, both ISPH and WCSPH methods can model free surface profiles properly if a proper solid boundary treatment is utilized. Meanwhile, local surface fluctuations can be damped in both methods efficiently by means of the modified surface viscosity.
By means of original versions, it is concluded that ISPH method is generally more stable and more accurate particularly in modeling pressure field than WCSPH method. In addition, it is shown that ISPH method is faster than WCSPH method in solving a dam break flow with equal number of particles. On the other hand, ISPH in its original version using the divergence-free velocity scheme suffers from density loss problem. Since a lot of modifications have been introduced till now to overcome defections of both methods, it is not fair to compare methods with different modifications and therefore, similar modifications are applied in this study. Meanwhile, it can be concluded that each method is growing and is going its own way through enhancement.

Keywords


1- Akbari, H., (2017). Simulation of wave overtopping using an improved SPH method. Coastal Engineering. 126, 51–68. 2- Asai, M., Aly, A.M., Sonoda, Y., Sakai, Y. (2012). A stabilized incompressible SPH method by relaxing the density invariant condition. Journal of Applied Mathematics. 2012, 24 pages. 3- Bonet, J., Lok, T.S. (1999). Variational and momentum preservation aspects of smooth particle hydrodynamic formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 180, 97–115. 4- Colagrossi, A., Landrini, M. (2003). Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics. 191(2), 448 -475. 5- Dehnen W., Aly H. (2012), Improving convergence in smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations without pairing instability. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 000, 1-15. 6- Fatehi, R., Manzari, M.T. (2012). A consistent and fast weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics with a new wall boundary condition. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 68, 905–921. 7- Ferrari, A., Dumbser M., Toro E. F., Armanini A. (2009). A new 3D parallel SPH scheme for free surface flows. Computers & Fluids. 38, 1203–1217. 8- Ferrand, M., Laurence, D., Rogers, B., Violeau, D., Kassiotis, C. (2012), Unified semi-analytical wall boundary conditions for inviscid, laminar or turbulent flows in the meshless SPH method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 71(4), 446–472. 9- Gomez-Gesteira, M., Rogers, B.D., Dalrymple, R.A., Crespo, A.J.C. (2010a). State-of-the-art of classical SPH for free-surface flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 48(Extra Issue), 6-27. 10- Gomez-Gesteira, M., Rogers, B.D., Violeau, D., Grassa, J.M., Crespo, A.J.C. (2010b). Foreword: SPH for free-surface flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 48(Extra Issue), 3-5. 11- Gotoh, H., Khayyer, A., Ikari, H., Arikawa, T., Shimosako, K. (2014). On enhancement of Incompressible SPH method for simulation of violent sloshing flows, Applied Ocean Research. 46, 104-115. 12- Gotoh, H., Khayyer, A. (2016). Current achievements and future perspectives for projection-based particle methods with applications in ocean engineering. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 2(3), 251–278. 13- Hughes, J.P., Graham, D.I. (2010). Comparison of incompressible and weakly-compressible SPH models for free-surface water flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 48, 105-117. 14- Khayyer, A., Gotoh, H., Shao, S.D. (2008). Corrected Incompressible SPH method for accurate water-surface tracking in breaking waves. Coastal Engineering. 55, 236–250. 15- Khayyer, A., Gotoh, H., 2010a. A higher order Laplacian model for enhancement and stabilization of pressure calculation by the MPS method. Appl. Ocean. Res. 32(1), 124–131. 16- Khayyer, A., Gotoh, H., 2010b. On particle-based simulation of a dam break over a wet bed. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 48(2), 238–249. 17- Khayyer, A., Gotoh, H., Shimizu, Y., 2017. Comparative study on accuracy and conservation properties of two particle regularization schemes and proposal of an optimized particle shifting scheme in ISPH context. Journal of Computational Physics. 332, 236–256. 18- Lee, E.S., Moulinec, C., Xu, R., Violeau, D., Laurence, D., Stansby, P. (2008). Comparisons of weakly compressible and truly incompressible algorithms for the SPH mesh free particle method. Journal of Computational Physics. 227, 8417–8436. 19- Lee, E.S., Violeau, D., Issa, R., Ploix, S. (2010). Application of weakly compressible and truly incompressible SPH to 3-D water collapse in waterworks. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 48, 50-60. 20- Monaghan, J.J. (1989). On the problem of penetration in particle methods. Journal of Computational Physics. 82(1), 1–15. 21- Monaghan, J.J. (1992). Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 30, 543–574. 22- Monaghan, J.J. (1994). Simulating free surface flows with SPH. Journal of Computational Physics. 110 (2), 399-406. 23- Monaghan, J.J., Kos, A. (1999). Solitary waves on a Cretan beach. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering (ASCE). 125, 145–154. 24- Monaghan, J.J. (2000). SPH without a Tensile Instability. Journal of Computational Physics. 159, 290–311. 25- Price, D.J. (2012). Smoothed particle hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics. 231(3), 759–794. 26- Rafiee, A., Cummins, Sh., Rudman, M., Thiagarajan, K. (2012). Comparative study on the accuracy and stability of SPH schemes in simulating energetic free-surface flows. European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids. 36, 1–16. 27- Shadloo, M.S., Zainali, A., Yildiz, M., Suleman, A. (2012). A robust weakly compressible SPH method and its comparison with an incompressible SPH. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 89, 939–956. 28- Shao, S.D., Lo, E.Y.M. (2003). Incompressible SPH method for simulating Newtonian and non-Newtonian flows with a free surface. Advances in Water Resources. 26, 787–800. 29- Shao, S.D. (2010). Incompressible SPH flow model for wave interactions over porous media. Coastal Engineering. 57, 304–316. 30- Sun, P.N., Colagrossi, A., Marrone, S., Zhang, A.M., 2017. The δplus-SPH model: Simple procedures for a further improvement of the SPH scheme. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 315, 25–49. 31- Swegle, J., Hicks, D.L., Attaway, S.W. (1995). Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics stability analysis. Journal of Computational Physics. 116, 123-134. 32- Szewc, K., Pozorski, J., Minier, J-P. (2012). Analysis of the incompressibility constraint in the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering .92, 343-369. 33- Violeau, D., Rogers, B.D., 2016. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) for free-surface flows: past, present and future, J. Hydraul. Res. 54(1), 1–26. 34- Xu, R., Stansby, P.K., Laurence, D. (2009). Accuracy and stability in incompressible SPH (ISPH) based on the projection method and a new approach. Journal of Computational Physics. 228, 6703-6725. 35- Xu, R. (2010). An Improved Incompressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Method and its Application in Free-Surface Simulations. PhD Thesis. School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.