1- Kaplan, S. and B.J. Garrick, B.J., On the Quantitative Definition of risk, 1981, Risk Analysis Vol. l (1), pp11-27, 1981.
2- Kaplan, S., Haimes, Y.Y. and Garrick, B.J., Fitting hierarchical holographic modelling (HHM) into the theory of scenario structuring and a refinement to the quantitative definition of risk, Risk Analysis, Vol.21 (5): pp 807-819, 2001.
3- Leveson N., Applying systems thinking to analyse and learn from events, Safety Science, Vol.49, pp 55–64, 2011.
5- Pitblado, R. and Nelson, W. R., Advanced Safety Barrier Management with Inclusion of Human and Organizational Aspects, Chemical engineering transactions Vol. 31, 2013. http://www.aidic.it/cet/13/31/056.pdf
6- Ramanathan, R. and Ganesh, L. S., Group preference aggregation methods employed in the AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members, European Journal of Operational Research 79, 249–265, 1994.
7- Ramanathan, R., A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment R. Journal of Environmental Management Vol.63, pp 27–35, 2001.
8- Saaty, T.L., The analytic hierarchy process, New York- McGraw Hill 1980.
9- Saaty, T., How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, European journal of operational Research, Vol. 48(1): 9-26, 1990.
10- Yasseri, S., Subsea technologies selection using analytic hierarchy process, International journal of underwater technology, Society for Underwater Technology, Volume 30, Number 3, pp. 151-164, 2012.